Hundred Years’ War

Hundred Years’ War

In battles fought from 1337 to 1453 primarily by England and France for control of France and the French Crown, England initially had the upper hand, but in 1429 the French, inspired by Joan of Arc, regained all areas of France that they had lost except for Calais. England and France had been at war several times before the Hundred Years’ War because of the landholdings of the English Crown in France.

Through several wars, the French had slowly been regaining control of these lands. With the beginning of the Hundred Years’ War the French found themselves losing ground against the English. Militarily the English longbow proved especially devastating to the French and led to the English victories at Crécy and Agincourt.

The English believed that they were secure in their victory but found the tables turned on them in 1429 by Joan of Arc. The French were able to retake much of the land the English had captured up to that point in the war. The Burgundians switched sides, joining the French, and the English found themselves pushed back even more.


The English would continue to send armies to France and were, at times, able to retake lost territory; the war had definitely turned against them. The akibat years of the war saw the English lose all their territory in France except Calais. With France’s control over all the previously controlled English lands in France, the war ended in 1453.

Early English Lands in France

The English and the French had been at odds over the relationship of their kings to each other because of the English Crown’s control over lands in France. In England the English king was sovereign, yet in France he was a vassal of the French king and accountable to the French king.

This accountability was used, usually on trumped up charges, by the French kings to try to take land away from the English. The French did this in 1202 and when the English king did not show up at the French court to answer charges brought against him, the French king declared his lands to be confiscated and war followed.

During the war (which lasted until 1204), the French conquered Normandy, Maine, and Anjou from the English. With the signing of the Treaty of Paris in 1259 the English had been reduced to control of just Aquitaine. The English king also reconfirmed his status as a vassal of the French king with respect to his lands in France.

English army in hundred years' war

The French trumped up charges again in 1294 against Edward I and again declared his lands confiscated and launched an invasion of those lands. The war lasted until 1298. This war also saw the Scots allied with the French against the English in 1295. A new peace treaty, the Treaty of Paris, was signed, returning the lands lost by the English during the war to them.

Isabella, the daughter of the French king Philip IV, was married to the English heir, Edward II. At the time this seemed to be a way to create lasting peace between the two kingdoms but ended up causing more problems by later giving the English king a claim to the French throne during the Hundred Years’ War.

In 1324 the French again provoked the English and summoned the English king to the French court. When the king did not show up, the French again declared the province of Aquitaine confiscated from the English and the two countries went to war again.

The war did not last long and in 1325 Edward II’s son, Edward III, and his mother went to France so Edward III could pay homage to the French king, Charles IV. Returning to England in 1327, Queen Isabella had Edward II deposed and Edward III, only 14 years old, crowned king.

With such a young king, the English ended up agreeing to a peace treaty that favored the French, allowing them to keep the land they had conquered. In 1328 the English were forced to make peace with the Scots and Charles IV, third son of Philip IV, died. None of Philip’s three sons had a male heir. Succession ended up going to the cousin of Charles IV, Philip of Valois.

While neither Edward nor his mother made any claim to the French throne at this time, Edward had himself crowned king of France in 1340. In French law, Edward had no claim to the Crown since French law did not recognize any claim by a female, or her offspring, to the throne of France.

The early years of Edward’s reign saw him pay homage to the French king, since he could not afford a war with France. Focusing on Scotland with the death of the Scottish king, Robert I, Edward was able to gain the upper hand there and bring Scotland back under England’s control.

However, being an ally of the Scots, Philip had an interest in what was happening there and tried to link negotiations for continued peace between France and England with the war in Scotland. In 1336 France had put together a fleet that was to take a French crusade to the Holy Land.

However, Pope Benedict XII canceled the crusade because of the problems of the French, English, and Scots. Instead it seemed to the English that the fleet would be used to invade England. While there was no invasion of England, the fleet did conduct raids on parts of the English coast and convinced the English that war with the French was coming.

Using the same ploy they had before, the French king summoned the English king, as the duke of Aquitaine, to turn over the French king’s brother, who had taken refuge in England. In 1337 when Edward did not comply with Philip’s order, Philip declared Edward’s land confiscated again and the Hundred Years’ War began.

Beginnings of the Hundred Years’ War

The war began with the French invading Aquitaine in 1337. The French fleet continued raiding the English coast. The English were finally able to defeat the French fleet at Sluys in 1340, which gave the English control of the English Channel, making it easier for them to move troops to France.

During this time Edward made alliances with the Low Countries and the German emperor and arranged to have his soldiers join theirs for a campaign against the French. However the date for the campaign kept being delayed until 1340.

The Flemish joined with Edward, who had himself crowned king of France on January 26, 1340. While the English laid siege to the town of Tournai, the French moved against the allied army but did not engage it. The war shifted to Brittany in 1341 with the death of the French duke.

Succession to the title was disputed and the English took the chance to support the side the French king opposed. Neither side was able to gain the upper hand and control of the entire province. The fighting continued for several years to come. In 1343 a truce was called, lasting until 1346.

Edward decided to conduct the campaign in 1346 with an English army and not rely on his allies for soldiers. Edward’s army landed in Normandy hoping to draw the French army away from Aquitaine, which it did. Marching first to the Seine River and then along it toward Paris, the English army raided the countryside and towns as it marched.

The French had destroyed most of the bridges across the Seine River and had a chance to trap the English army but instead allowed the English to cross the river and march away. The French would have the same chance again when the English army reached the Somme River and again the French allowed the English to cross the river and escape. Edward finally stopped retreating and chose the area around Crécy to give battle to the French on August 26, 1346.

Edward picked an easily defended spot that forced the French to attack him uphill. He also deployed his archers to have a clear field of fire against the advancing French. The French arrived on the battlefield late in the day, yet chose to attack instead of waiting until the next day.

The French also did not attempt to organize a massed attack against the English; instead, they attacked as they arrived on the battlefield, thus leading to approximately 15 independent assaults on the English position.

The English archers cut down each assault with few of the French knights actually reaching the English men at arms. French casualties were estimated at over 1,500 knights and nobles and up to 20,000 infantry and crossbowmen. English casualties were about 200 men.

With his victory, Edward moved against Calais, which he laid siege to in September 1346 and captured in August 1347. The next several years would see only minor fighting, and even a truce for a short time. Philip VI died in August 1350 and John II became the new French king. Under the new king, the French and English engaged in peace negotiations, but these were broken off in 1355 by the French.

Treatis and Raids

The English responded to the break in negotiations by launching raids into France. The most successful raid was in 1356, led by Edward’s son, Edward the Black Prince (so named because he wore black armor). Launching from Bordeaux, he marched his army toward the Loire River but turned back before crossing the river.

As he moved back to Bordeaux, he was blocked by a French army led by King John at Poitiers. On September 19, using the terrain to his advantage, the Black Prince was able to defeat the French using the terrain and his archers to cut down the attacking French. More important was the capture of the French king by the English.

With his capture, the French found themselves in a civil war between the dauphin and Charles of Navarre over who should control France. In 1359 Edward brought an army to France in an attempt to capture Reims. When he was unable to capture the city, he considered marching on several other cities, including Paris, but in the end decided to return to England.

The English and French signed a treaty on May 8, 1360, that released King John from English captivity and recognized English sovereignty over Calais, Ponthieu, Poitoum, and Aquitaine. Also part of the treaty was a clause where Edward agreed to stop calling himself the king of France. It looked as if the English had won the war. Even with the peace treaty in place, the French and English continued fighting on a low level.

This included the French civil war, which did not end until May 1364 with the defeat of Charles of Navarre. The French and English also found themselves on opposite sides of the fighting in Castile where the English, under the command of the Black Prince, prevailed. Unfortunately the fighting forced the Black Prince to raise taxes in Aquitaine.

The people of Aquitaine then appealed to the French king, Charles V (who had become king in 1364 when his father, John, had died). Therefore in November 1368 Charles V declared the English land confiscated again. Edward tried to negotiate a settlement with Charles, but when that failed Edward again declared himself king of France and the two countries were at war with each other again.

The French made significant gains in recovering territory they had given up in 1360. They were even able to launch raids on the English coast, whose defenses had been neglected after the peace treaty in 1360. This raised concerns that the French might actually invade England. In response, the English launched raids on cities they thought the French might use to stage their invasion.

By the end of 1369 English actions had eliminated the possibility of a French invasion. Over the next several years the English would continue to launch raids into the French-controlled territory, but they also lost territory to the French. Both sides continued to raid each other’s territory and avoid a set piece battle.

In 1376 Edward the Black Prince died; in the following year, 1377, Edward III also died. This left the Black Prince’s son, 10-year-old Richard II, as king of En gland. Small scale fighting continued through the 1380s until both sides agreed upon a truce in June 1389. The truce would last, with the usual intermittent raiding, until 1415.

Henry V and Charles VI

Starting in the early 1400s the French gave support to Scotland and Wales in their struggle against the English. They also launched several raids against English ports. However the French king, Charles VI, who came to power in 1380, suffered from insanity. Because of this, he was unable to keep his nobles controlled and in 1407, a civil war broke out between the Orléanists and Burgundians.

Both sides asked the English for aid. In 1413 Henry V was crowned king of England. While his father, Henry IV, had provided some support to the Burgundians, Henry V determined to take full advantage of the chaos in France. Thus in 1415 an English army of 12,000 men invaded France.

Landing in Normandy, Henry first laid siege to the town of Harfleur, which took over a month to capture. Henry lost about half his men during the siege. Henry then decided to march over land to Calais. Henry left his siege equipment behind so he could move fast. The French set out in pursuit of Henry with an army of 30,000 men.

Although Henry was moving fast, even in the rain, he had trouble finding a crossing to get across the Somme River, which allowed the French to get ahead of him. They chose the area near the castle of Agincourt to try to stop Henry. While the sides tried to negotiate a settlement, neither side was interested in budging from its position.

On October 25, 1415, the two sides fought the Battle of Agincourt. The French commander had originally wanted to fight a defensive battle since the English were short on supplies, but the French nobles convinced him to attack since they had a numerical superiority.

Battle of Agincourt

The English took up a position with forests on either side of them. They had about 5,000 archers and only 800 men at arms. The archers placed sharpened stakes in the ground in front of them as protection from the mounted French knights. The ground between the two armies was wet and freshly plowed, which made it hard to move across.

The French nobles were unwilling to wait for the English to attack and eventually convinced the French commander to order an attack. With the wet, plowed ground slowing them down, the French took terrible losses from the English archers. Approximately a third of the French troops were in the initial attack and most were either killed or captured.

The next two attacks by the French were also thrown back by the English, although they did not meet the same fate as the first attack since they withdrew before being destroyed. Exact French losses are not known for sure, but estimates put their losses at 6,000–8,000 men. There is also no exact record of English losses, but they were few compared to the French.

Henry’s next campaign started in 1417 and went until 1419. This time he completed the conquest of the Normandy region. The Burgundians, still English allies, were able to gain the upper hand in their civil war and capture Paris.

In May 1420 the Treaty of Troyes was signed; it declared Henry to be Charles VI’s heir and required him to continue to support the Burgundians in their civil war against the Orléanists, who were now supporting the dauphin. Henry died in 1422 and his nine-month-old son became the new king of England. Even with Henry’s death, the English continued their war against the Orléanists. Charles VI died two months after Henry V. With Charles’s death, Henry VI was crowned king of France.

Joan of Arc

The war took a sudden change for the better for the French with the appearance of Joan of Arc in 1429. She led an army to victory against the English, laying siege to the town of Orléans in May 1429. This was the first of many victories that led to the coronation of the dauphin as Charles VII. Joan was captured and turned over to the English in May 1430. The English had her put on trial for witchcraft, convicted, and burned at the stake.

The English had hoped to strike a blow against the French morale but only succeeded in inspiring them. In September 1435 the French civil war was ended and with it the alliance between the Burgundians and the English. The French continued to retake territory from the English, including Paris, which fell in April 1436. Both sides agreed to a truce in 1444, which lasted for five years.

The French used the truce to reorganize their army, so that when the truce ended in 1449 they were ready to end the war. Starting with an invasion for Normandy in 1449 that was completed by 1450, they pushed the English out of France over the next several years. The conquest of Aquitaine would take longer. The initial invasion began in 1451 but was slowed in 1452 when the English sent troops there in an effort to stop the French.

While the English were successful in slowing the French, the French were able to defeat the English army in July 1453 and by October 1453, with the fall of Bordeaux, they completed their conquest of Aquitaine and ended the Hundred Years’ War. The only French soil still controlled by the English was Calais, which they controlled until 1558.

Avignonese Papacy

Avignonese Papacy

The Avignonese papacy (1304–78) and the Great Schism (1378–1414) are regarded as two of the most dramatic events in the history of Christianity that further undermined and diminished the prestige of the papacy and the authority of the Western Latin Church.

The first penggalan refers to the nearly century-long pontificate of eight popes, who from the beginning of the 14th century until 1378 ruled the Christian world from the French town of Avignon, being held captive by Philip IV the Fair; because of its forced nature, the Avignonese papacy is also called the Avignonese Captivity, or Exile.

Historians attribute the cause of the Avignonese Exile of the papacy to the earlier conflict between Pope Boniface VIII and the young French king Philip the Fair in the preceding century, when the king and the pope were struggling to proclaim their rule over Europe. In the center of the conflict stood new military taxes the king levied on French monasteries, requiring new subsidies to fight his wars with the English.


Boniface rejected the king’s claims for financing his army on account of the church in the bull Clericis laicos from 1290 and later paid for his stubbornness with his own life, literally terrified to death by the king’s chancellor William of Nogaret.

Boniface’s direct successor, Benedict XI (1303–04), did not live long enough to pacify the spirits, supposedly having been poisoned by an unidentified monk; a new pope, old and gravely ill, Bertrand de Got, who assumed the name Clement V, led the papacy into exile.

Residing in France at the time of his election, weakened by what was likely cancer, and discouraged by the fate of his predecessor, Clement V capitulated to Philip’s demands that he should be crowned at Lyon. He established the tradition of the Avignonese papacy, never setting foot in the ancient city of Rome.

Pope John XXII

Clement’s Avignon successors (seven popes, among whom the most famous were John XXII and Benedict XII) all remained loyal to the French rulers, playing whenever necessary against the German emperor and the English, which outwardly may have been seen as an ordinary state of affairs had it not been for the fact of direct influence the French kings exercised in the curia.

Throughout the 14th century the Avignonese papacy was continuously showing signs of decline of papal authority, which was becoming increasingly undermined by the feudal monarchy. In 1312 the papacy surrendered to the will of Philp IV and dismissed the Order of the Templars, famous for its wealth, with thousands of its members accused of heresy, witchcraft, and sodomy and all its treasures confiscated by the crown.

The fiscal oppression of the curia (chiefly through control over the sale of benefices and indulgences but also over tithes and annates) became more amplified during the Avignonese papacy, despite the heavy French presence in the College of Cardinals (seven out of eight Avignonese popes and almost all of the important cardinals were Frenchmen by the middle of 14th century).

In due course the popes built themselves a fortified palace behind the walls of Avignon and lived there surrounded by luxury in the midst of magnificent artificial gardens. The luxurious lifestyle of the popes was subject to constant complaints and gossip. Contemporaries, including such important thinkers as Petrarch, Marsilius of Padua, and Catherine of Siena, relentlessly criticized the Avignonese popes.

The image of the papacy during those years changed sharply, having lost its unconditional spiritual authority and its control over the brethren. Petrarch called the Avignonese papacy “the Babylonian Captivity of the Church” and Avignon popes “wolves in shepherds’ clothing.”

The Avignonese papacy was detested by most social sectors—from peasants who suffered the ever-increasing taxation to intellectuals and theologians who wrote against the tabiat and spiritual degradation of the Holy Office. In the next centuries the Avignonese papacy was described as totally deprived of spirituality.

Subservience to a secular ruler, nepotism, and rapacity of the “puppet-popes” seriously undermined the reputation of papacy in the eyes of Europe, marking at the same time the end of the reign of Church Universal and the beginning of a new epoch, where ultimate power belonged with the national ruler.

The Avignon church underwent a complete makeover. Despite criticisms, almost all Avignon popes undertook serious attempts at reform. They created a sophisticated and effective administration that surpassed anything previously known in the European states. The popes’ involvement in secular politics also grew during these years, despite the forced capitulation to France.

Both developments effectively turned the church into a modern, secularized, and politicized organization. The last years of the popes’ stay at Avignon are also marked by their recurring attempts to strengthen their position in Italy.

Quite unsuccessfully they tried to turn the outcome of the revolt of Cola di Rienzo in 1347 to their favor, but even after this failure popes continued to maintain close economic and political relations with Italy. Their selesai success and return to Rome is indebted to the activity of Cardinal Albornoz and Pope Urban V, who gave constitution to the Papal States.

Taking advantage of the difficulties France was experiencing during the Hundred Years’ War (1337–1453), Pope Gregory XI (1370–78) transferred the papal residence back to Rome in 1378, dying just a few months after this historic reunion of the church with its ancient capital. This move, however, was attempted too late to save the papacy from disaster: Its return was blackened by the shadow of the Great Schism.

Pope Gregory XI transferred the papal residence back to Rome in 1378

Soon after Gregory XI died, the Roman people, fearing that a new pope might leave them for France once again, gathered under the walls of the conclave, demanding election of an Italian to the Holy See. Cardinals, the majority of whom were Frenchmen, chose the archbishop of Bari, a Neapolitan, Bartholomew Prignano, to be elected the next pope. He accepted the Holy Office, taking the name of Urban VI. No doubt that Prignano, who had previously held a position of a vice chancellor of the curia, seemed an excellent choice to the cardinals.

They were confident they could control the “little archbishop” (as they nicknamed their candidate), who would be grateful for this unexpected promotion. Later the cardinals would announce that they had elected Prignano under threats and for fear of the reaction of the angry mob that was raging on the streets surrounding the palace during the election.

From the very start the pontificate of the new pope was stained with a most bitter struggle with the cardinals and members of the curia of non-Italian origin. Harsh reform measures of the new pontiff, who was irritated at the slightest pretext, and physically assaulted cardinals on several occasions (publicly announcing their lifestyle of pomposity and splendor as sinful), caused the French party to flee from Rome.

Urban soon found himself at daggers drawn with everyone around him, managing to deprive the Holy See of a number of its most loyal supporters, such as Joanna, queen of Naples; her husband, Duke Otto of Brunswick; and the powerful duke of Fondi, not to mention the king of France.

Pope Clement VII

On August 9, 1378, under a pretext that Urban’s appointment was forced, the conclave of the fugitive cardinals issued a lengthy document, entitled Declaratio, where they declared the election invalid and the Holy Office vacant. At the same sitting they unanimously voted for the Gallic cardinal Robert of Geneva, who assumed the office under the name of Clement VII (1378–94), thus becoming an “anti-pope.”

The following 40 years were characterized by almost constant warfare between pope and anti-pope, in which the Papal States were the chief playground. The schism left no one sitting on the fence. Having unparalleled impact on political allegiances, it reshaped European geopolitics, changing cultural boundaries and paving the way for the upcoming Reformation.

With every passing year the split went deeper. On the side of the “French” Pope Clement VII fought such powerful allies as the king of France, the kings of Naples and Scotland, and half of the rulers of Germany; Urban was supported by England, Portugal, and Hungary.

The legal pope continued to be tactless and inconsiderate to his allies, and gradually his authority grew weak. Appointing new cardinals to replace the rebels was not a sufficient measure to keep discipline among the supporters; constantly suspecting treachery, Urban did not hesitate to send several cardinals to be executed for “disobedience” to his will.

Isolated and defeated in most of his battles, Urban locked himself up in his castle—mainly to hide from the French king who had announced a huge prize for the pope’s head. In 1389 Urban VI came back to Rome, where he died, according to one source, surrounded by followers; according to another, he was poisoned by enemies.

Soon after Urban’s funeral it became clear that even the disappearance of one of the ruling pontiffs would not save the situation—the “Italian” party immediately appointed a successor. Thus receiving a precedent, the schism continued—Clement VII was succeeded by Benedict XIII (from 1394); Urban VI by Boniface IX (1389–1404), Innocent VII (1404–06), and Gregory XII (from 1406).

The conflict deteriorated when the Council of Pisa in 1409 deposed both Benedict XIII and Gregory XII, selecting new pope Alexander V (1409–10). The deposed popes refused to recognize the decision of the Council, and the Holy See became occupied by three popes at once.

This development was very favorable to the heretical movements that rose in large quantities all across Europe, preaching noninstitutional evangelism and unbalancing the old feudal system. Secular lords and princes who supported the establishment and the unity of the church were greatly concerned, despite the fact that the decrease in the papal authority contributed to consolidation of power in the hands of secular rulers.

The schism continued well into the 15th century, until, finally, the Council of Constance (1414–18) put an end to it, having deposed three popes at once: John XXIII (successor of Alexander V), Gregory XII, and Benedict XIII, and selecting, to the great relief of everyone involved, a single pontiff—Martin V (1417–31).

Massachusetts Bay Colony

Massachusetts Bay Colony

In the early 17th century, England began acting on its imperial ambitions by chartering business organizations called joint-stock companies, which undertook the actual work and expense of spreading England and its institutions around the world. The system had created the colony of Jamestown, Virginia, and the Council for New England, under the leadership of Sir Ferdinando Gorges.

During the 1620s, one of the council’s patents went to some Dorchester merchants to develop a fishing industry at Cape Ann on the New England coast. By 1626, the effort had failed, although John White, a Puritan minister in England associated with the project, began to see the enterprise as a potential refuge for discouraged Puritans from England.

Unfortunately for White and a group of fellow Puritans who had joined him, the Council for New England had ceased effective operation, and the group instead applied directly to the government for its own charter for the lands it already held. The charter, for a company called The Governor and Company of the Massachusetts Bay in New England, was issued in March of 1629.


The company was to be managed by a governor and a council of 18 assistants, who were to be elected by a General Court of investors, which also had the power to legislate for the company. Not part of the charter was the usual requirement that the company conduct its business meetings in England.

This omission, quite possibly done by design, allowed the company to hold its meetings wherever it chose. In late August of 1629, in what is known as the Cambridge Agreement, the company opted to move its operations, including the charter, to New England.

When control of the company quickly passed into the hands of dedicated Puritans willing to leave England, the company started its transformation into a colony. By late 1629, the company had sent out John Endicott to assert its control over a settlement at Salem and had then supported that effort with five more ships and possibly one hundred additional settlers.

City Upon a Hill

Thus, by April of 1630, when a flotilla of 11 ships left England, the Massachusetts Bay Company was already a significant presence on the New England coast, and its conversion into a full-fledged colony assured. John Winthrop, elected the company’s governor, established the character of early Massachusetts in a sermon preached at the outset of the journey.

He stressed that the colony would be created as a covenant with God, and that religious orthodoxy would be maintained by the merging of civil and ecclesiastical power and consolidated in the hands of the colony’s leaders. His reference to Massachusetts as a “city upon a hill” to serve as an example to England of what God intended for his people further solidified the religious nature of the proposed colony.

There is no question about the success of the enterprise. The Company of the Massachusetts Bay was indistinguishable from what came to be called simply the colony of Massachusetts. And the religious nature of the colony was secured by requiring that only male church members could vote in colony elections.

There were challenges to some aspects of the colony from Roger Williams, Anne Hutchinson, Quakers, and the freemen of the colony who demanded an elected body to represent them, but there was never any likelihood in New England that the colony would not succeed.

But that certainty was not the case in England. Sir Ferdinando Gorges, still hanging on to the remnants of the Council for New England, argued that the colony’s charter had been secretly obtained and started a campaign to have it annulled.

To the same end in 1635, the council gave up its own charter and requested that the king reassign the disputed territory to eight members of the former Council for New England. The outbreak of the English Civil War, or Puritan Revolution, in 1640, however, prevented any of the grants except the one for Maine from being made.

By the time of the Restoration of the Stuart monarchy in 1660, Gorges had died, the Council of New England had passed from the scene, and Massachusetts had become too powerful and too independent to be easily tamed.

Control of Commerce

With the Restoration, England commenced a colonial policy that stressed the importance of commerce in the empire and the necessity of England’s control of that commerce for the greater good of the mother country.

Massachusetts viewed such a policy as interference in its self-styled independence. When England decided to oust the Dutch from New Netherland in 1664, the leaders of the expedition were ordered to investigate the situation in New England. Their report was especially critical of Massachusetts, but through delay and avoidance the colony managed to escape serious ramifications.

England tried again in 1676, when it sent over Edward Randolph. Randolph’s report was more damaging than the previous commissioners’ account, and the English government felt compelled to act.

It ordered the colony to send representatives to negotiate a settlement, but when England determined that the colony had not lived up to its agreements, it commenced legal action against the original charter as the only method whereby Massachusetts could be brought under control.

England completed the effort in 1684, and the courts annulled the original 1629 charter. The colony existed dependently until it was incorporated into the Dominion of New England in 1686. In the aftermath of the Glorious Revolution in England, Massachusetts received a new charter in 1691 as a royal colony, the Province of Massachusetts Bay.

The Puritan old guard were displeased, but by the end of the 17th century the original charter had generally outlived its usefulness, as perhaps demonstrated by the Salem witchcraft trials.

The more practical and forward-looking portion of the colonists recognized that future growth and prosperity lay with a royal charter, the institution of a property qualification for the vote, and a more cooperative relationship with English authority. Those whose ancestors had migrated as Puritans under the 1629 charter had become the Yankees of the 1691 charter. They and their colony were ready for the 18th century.

Puritans

Puritans

More than 1 commentator has noted the irony of Puritan New England: that a club founded thence idealistically equally a haven of religious freedom would inwards plough persecute religious dissenters.

This observation reflects pregnant misunderstandings close Puritan beliefs, ideology, too identity. The beingness of a royal conspiracy to suppress the Puritan displace inwards England was a key chemical constituent inwards New England’s founding mythology.

However, the Puritans fled to New England non to permit unfettered religious freedom but to instruct the “gospel liberty” to erect a godly society—a “New Israel”—in accordance amongst their specific beliefs.


The Puritans saw themselves equally a righteous remnant surrounded past times enemies, and, admonished past times the noesis that God’s approving on their club was predicated on its monastic tell too obedience, their religious too political psychology was reflexively defensive.

Tracing the New England Puritans’ obsession amongst conspiracy theories helps clarify the motivations for fleeing England too the rationale for exactly about of the acts of intolerance that soundless give them a bad reputation.

The Puritans who began to instruct inwards in America inwards the 1630s were but a small-scale share of the participants inwards a fifty-year-old reform displace that originated inwards the Elizabethan Church of England. Best understood equally a loose, incomplete alliance of progressive Protestants composed of both clergy too laypeople of middling too gentry status, the Puritans worked to extend the Protestant Reformation inwards England.

Forsaking the “papist” rituals of the established Church of England, Puritans gathered inwards autonomous congregations or “conventicles,” inwards which membership was only extended to demonstrably pure individuals, called “saints” or the “elect.” Moral legislation was also a key strategy to remedying England’s “halfly reformed” society.

Distressed past times what they saw equally Anglicanism’s plough dorsum to Roman Catholic practices, they agitated vociferously inwards their parishes too inwards Parliament for religious purity inwards ways that earned them their name, a derogatory epithet hurled past times their many detractors.

Opposition to Puritan reforms from the monarchy too the moderate elements inwards the Church of England was unending, but increased peculiarly nether the Stuarts, James I too Charles I, too through the efforts of the bishop of London, William Laud, who became archbishop of Canterbury inwards 1633.

James I, who believed that abolishing the national church building would correspond a threat to royal prerogative, famously declared of the Puritans that “I volition harry them out of the land.” Laud, meanwhile, harassed Puritan clergy past times manipulating the Church of England bureaucracy. Influenza A virus subtype H5N1 climactic evolution occurred inwards 1629, when Charles I suspended the Puritan-dominated Parliament.


This effectively ended Puritan efforts past times putting out of attain the only possible avenue for legislating religious reform inside the Church of England, too hinted at a to a greater extent than menacing too repressive royal posture toward nonconformity.

The City on a Hill

Frustrated past times these defeats, too fearful of to a greater extent than persecution, a sizeable cohort of Puritans made the hard conclusion to instruct out an England they at nowadays found intractably corrupt. Influenza A virus subtype H5N1 small-scale vanguard left inwards the tardily 1620s, founding Salem, Massachusetts, inwards 1629. What became known equally the “Great Migration” began inwards 1630, when a flotilla of ships carrying the colony’s kickoff governor, John Winthrop, left England for the New World.

In a defining sermon that ready out the ideological too religious foundations for the novel colony, Winthrop declared that the emigrants were a covenant people of God, a “New Israel” whose purpose was to do a godly “City on a Hill” that would travel a Christian beacon for a lost too corrupt England.

The Puritan seek to do a model club inwards New England depended on a unique too durable synthesis of church building too province that came to travel known equally the “Congregational Way.” Godly life was ordered collectively, too the pillars of social purity were the clergyman too the “godly magistrate.” Church too province were separate, dissimilar the state-supported Anglican Church, but their roles were complementary.

At the middle of each town was the church, or coming together house, which ofttimes doubled equally the local courtroom or town hall. Membership to the congregation was carefully limited to those who could demonstrate bear witness of their conversion or sanctification. Electoral franchise inwards local politics, meanwhile, was only offered to church building members.

Further, although they were non allowed to concur world office, clergymen performed valuable civic functions past times preaching election sermons, or presiding over days of fasting inwards times of trouble. Moral codes, such equally New Haven’s famous “blue laws,” were legislated too enforced to keep monastic tell too purity.

Maintaining Orthodoxy

While Puritan club was notable for the cohesiveness of its governing institutions, its divine mandate too its precarious house on the American frontier made it deeply susceptible to rumors too conspiracy theories. Particularly troubling was the work of religious sectarianism.

As a terminal enclave of truthful Christianity, it was slow for Puritans to regard conspiracies of heretics arrayed against them, plots that ultimately were of satanic derivation. Samuel Sewall, a prominent Boston merchant, similar many of his compatriots, was deeply fearful of “the plots of papists, Atheists, &c.” (Sewall, 10).

That New Englanders dealt amongst heterodoxy inwards ways that ofttimes were immoderate reflected their belief that conspiracies to gospel liberty—real too imagined—lay behind religious dissent too diversity.

The kickoff challenges to New England’s religious orthodoxy emerged inwards the kickoff decade of settlement, too were led past times 2 vivid too charismatic individuals, Roger Williams too Anne Hutchinson.

Beginning inwards 1634 Williams rocked the soundless evolving orthodox Puritan establishment inwards New England past times argument that the colony’s church-state matrix was reverse to scriptural law. He objected to the thought that civil authorities should suppress religious dissent, enforce church building attendance, or protect the do of religion.

His views advocating “soul liberty” too the strict separation of church building too province seem to anticipate the ideas of Thomas Jefferson too James Madison, but his intention was quite different: he believed that whatsoever church-state alliance invariably corrupted the church.

Since gospel freedom depended on submission to proper civil too religious authority, his ideas too popularity attacked the nexus of Puritan social monastic tell too raised fears of a wider sectarian conspiracy. He was banished from Massachusetts inwards 1636 too settled inwards Rhode Island.

Anne Hutchinson’s challenge to New England’s religious order, meanwhile, incited what came to travel known equally the Antinomian Crisis (1636–1638). Influenza A virus subtype H5N1 vivid woman, she expressed dissatisfaction amongst the theology too preaching of many of the colony’s ministers.

She held meetings inwards her Boston dwelling that attracted crowds of men too women, inwards which she discussed too criticized the weekly sermons she had heard. While the Puritan displace encouraged lay participation inwards theological debate, her dissent, gender, too large next made her ministry building peculiarly controversial.

As a threat to the clerical establishment, she was, similar Williams, banished from the colony—but non without a pregnant political struggle, because many of her manly individual supporters included a release of powerful merchants.

Having quelled dissent from within, New England Puritans side past times side faced a sectarian invasion from without. Beginning inwards the 1650s, members of the Quaker sect—an offshoot of radical Protestantism inwards England—began to instruct inwards in Massachusetts, settling mainly inwards Salem too Boston.

Beyond pregnant theological differences, the Quakers were a threat to Puritan club because they recognized the authorization of no civil government, refused to pay taxes too serve inwards the militia, too acknowledged no hierarchy of political leadership.

They publicly denounced the Puritan ministers equally a bunch of hacks or “hirelings.” Aggressive inwards their proselytizing, the most radical shape of Quaker witness was called “going naked for a sign,” when Quaker women would run naked through Puritan churches too civic courts.

In the words of a Puritan broadside, Quakerism was “destructive to cardinal trueths [sic] of religion” (Pestana, 33). But New England’s leaders, who were non amused past times the accusations of ungodliness, ultimately failed to quell the threat to their godly commonwealth.

Faced amongst Puritan repression—beatings, imprisonment, too fifty-fifty executions—the Quakers would non desist. The most famous Quaker “martyr,” Mary Dyer, was a one-time follower of Anne Hutchinson who converted to Quakerism inwards the 1650s.

In 1659 she too 2 comrades were convicted for apostasy inwards Boston too sentenced to death. Because the Puritan magistrates feared a world outcry or perhaps fifty-fifty an ready on on the town past times other Quakers, her judgement was commuted too she was banished from Boston amongst the threat of decease should she return.

She did, too she was hanged on 1 June 1 1660 along amongst 3 other Quakers. News of these executions spread to England too attracted the negative attending of King Charles II, too the Puritans were gradually forced to ameliorate their repressive tactics.

Unable to enforce religious uniformity, Puritan clergy too magistrates resorted to see to keep the godliness of New England society. While Quakers were the most visible challenge to Puritan society, a to a greater extent than insidious threat came from vice too disorder inside New England.

Puritan fearfulness of “declension,” or the perception that New England was falling away from its divinely ordained mission, was the impetus for the pastorled “Reformation of Manners,” a moral-reform stimulate that began inwards 1679.

In sermons too laws, authorities targeted a whole host of practices too behaviors equally immoral: folk magic too witchcraft, harvest revels, tavern culture, too sexual vice. Resisting immorality required vigilance, since pastors too magistrates believed that disorder was non only the random appear of human nature, but was constituent of a satanic plot to undermine the terminal enclave of truthful Christianity.

From Colony to Province

If fears of heterodox conspiracies too moral laxity preoccupied the Puritan ruling class, New England’s vulnerable seat equally an isolated colonial outpost was also a source of conspiracy theories.

The Puritans fancied that they had founded their “City on a Hill” inwards a “howling wilderness,” surrounded past times existent too imagined enemies. Their Native American neighbors were objects of suspicion too fear, too New England fought 2 cruel wars against them, the Pequot War (1637) too King Philip’s War (1675–1676).

Rumors of imminent Indian ready on were constant throughout the seventeenth too eighteenth centuries. The “Eastern Indians” allied amongst the French inwards Quebec too began attacking New England inwards the 1680s, initiating a wheel of warfare that would non cease until the 1760s.

This combined French too Indian threat had special connotations inwards the Puritan religious too political imagination. As a powerful Catholic nation, French Republic too its violet ambitions represented cypher less than the temporal musical instrument of the papal Antichrist.

Thus Puritans refracted geopolitical developments too violet adversaries through the lens of their collective identity equally a people amongst a divine mission. More complicated, however, were New England’s increasingly contentious relations amongst England.

While the Puritans had fled persecution, they had never disavowed the woman parent country, nor had they formally rejected the Church of England. The founding charter signed past times Charles I gave the kickoff Puritan colonists unprecedented powers of self-rule, allowing them to withdraw their ain governor too erect the institutions that supported their godly identity.

Events inwards England—the Civil War, the execution of Charles I, the dominion of Oliver Cromwell, too the Restoration of Charles II inwards 1660—meant that New England was effectively independent for the kickoff xxx years of its existence.

Displeased amongst New England’s commercial too religious independence, Charles II began to reassert English linguistic communication command over the colonies. Historians debate when Puritan New England tin give the axe travel said to convey “ended,” but sure a pivotal transition occurred when Charles II revoked Massachusetts’s charter inwards 1684.

Authority was wrested from the Puritan-elected governor too handed to a novel royal appointee, Governor Edmund Andros. This inaugurated a decade of the politics of conspiracy equally the established Puritan leadership too the newly arrived royal representatives struggled for power.

Andros arrived inwards Boston inwards 1686 too forthwith alienated the Puritan leadership. Influenza A virus subtype H5N1 devout Anglican, he deliberately flouted Puritan religious sensibilities too refused to defer to the deposed Puritan elite inwards colonial decision-making.

Fearing their religious liberties were at risk, the Puritans retaliated inwards 2 ways: they spread rumors close Andros’s corruption too incompetence, too they sent Increase Mather, the colony’s most of import clergyman, to London inwards 1688 to renegotiate the charter amongst the novel king, James II.

However, inwards exactly about other outbreak inwards the conflict betwixt monarch too Commons, James II—a Catholic advocate of absolute monarchy—was overthrown inwards 1688 too replaced past times William III, a Protestant who was much to a greater extent than conciliatory to parliamentary powers.

This “Glorious Revolution” had pregnant effects inwards the American colonies. Hearing this news, the New England Puritans acted preemptively. Declaring that Andros, equally the appointee of James II, was no longer the legitimate ruler, on 18 Apr 1689 the leadership of Puritan Boston rose upwards too overthrew Andros.

In documents justifying this coup, they argued that Puritan New England had been oppressed past times Andros’s tyranny; he had led the colony to disaster since the revocation of the old charter inwards 1684. “[A]ll our concerns both Civil too Sacred, convey suffered past times the Arbitrary Oppressions of UnreasonableMen,” they wrote, too produced an ofttimes hyperbolic litany of grievances too conspiracy theories.

They defendant Andros of bungling a armed services stimulate against the Eastern Indians, which resulted inwards peachy loss of life to New Englanders, too of willfully suppressing intelligence of the Glorious Revolution inwards England—which they characterized equally “the rescue [of] the English linguistic communication patch from imminent POPERY too SLAVERY”—in monastic tell to remain inwards power.

Implausibly, they also believed Andros to travel complicit inwards an imminent ready on on New England past times Catholic France, too claimed that the French planned to kidnap the terminal Puritan governor of the colony, Simon Bradstreet (A. B., 48–53).

In short, the Puritan leaders constructed from a rigid stew of rumor too conspiracy theories an ideological justification for overthrowing Andros, past times which they hoped to reconstitute the authorization too political institutions they had enjoyed nether the old charter.

Significantly, however, the political rhetoric they employed did non invoke thence much the religious idioms of godly freedom but reflected a new, to a greater extent than secular vocabulary too claimed—in a premonition of the American Revolution—that they acted inwards defence of their “English liberties.”

This was a fleeting victory, however, since William III was unwilling to restore the old charter. In 1691 Mather returned to New England amongst a novel charter that irrevocably reshaped Puritan political life.

Electoral franchise based on church building membership too a authorities elected exclusively inside the colony was replaced past times a franchise based on holding too a authorities supervised from London.

Mather was convinced that this novel charter was the best he could convey obtained, but from thence on New England was governed through the linguistic communication of English linguistic communication constitutionalism, non the spiritual vision of the Puritan founders.

Genghis Khan

Genghis Khan

Genghis or Chinggis Khan means “universal ruler.” He was born Temuchin, the son of a minor Mongol chief, and overcame early obstacles to conquer the greatest empire of the world to date, which he bequeathed to his sons. Some believe he was a greater military strategist than Alexander the Great, Hannibal, Julius Caesar, and Napoleon Bonaparte.

At the time of his birth the varied people of the steppes (Turkic, Mongol, and others) lived in mutually warring tribes, raiding one another for animals and women and looting nearby sedentary populations. The harsh environment of the steppes where they lived provided little opportunity for agriculture, limiting the peoples to a nomadic lifestyle of herding and hunting.

His father, Yesugei, died of poisoning at the hands of foes when Temuchin was eight years old, en route home after betrothing him to a girl from his mother, H’oelun’s, tribe. H’oelun and her sons were cast out to fend for themselves after Yesugei died; thanks to Temuchin’s cunning and ruthless determination, they survived.


Eventually he married his betrothed, named Borte; received help from his father-in-law in establishing himself with followers and animals; and won allies. Borte was the mother of four sons (Juji Khan, Chagatai Khan, Ogotai Khan, and Tului Khan) and a daughter. Juji was born around the time his mother was rescued from captivity (she had been captured in a raid by Temuchin’s enemy), casting doubt on his paternity. These four sons became Temuchin’s principal heirs.

From Temuchin to Genghis Khan

In complicated wars Temuchin and his allies won against tribes named the Naiman, Merkid, Oyirad, Tartar, Kereyid, and others, becoming master of the Mongolian plateau by 1205. A great council or khuriltai was convened in 1206 to signal the formation of a confederation at Burkan Khaldan, the holy mountain of the Mongols under Temuchin, and to give him the title Genghis Khan.

From this point on all his followers, regardless of tribal affiliation, were called Mongols. In Mongol ideology the elevation of Temuchin to Genghis Khan was blessed by heaven and therefore it was his right to conquer and to bequeath his conquests to his family.

Genghis Khan’s first great achievement was to organize his men into a unified army. He used the decimal system: Each 10-man group had a leader; 10 of these formed into a 100-man unit under a leader, and so on up, each commander being responsible for 10 men under him.

In time the Mongolian component of his army grew to between 105,000 and 129,000 men. As his empire expanded, subject peoples incorporated into his infantry and cavalry followed the same organizational rules. The Mongolian army did not possess weapons or technology superior to those of its enemies. Its superiority lay in its discipline, mobility, coordination, and maneuverability.

Records were necessary to administer his people, so in 1206 he ordered the creation a script for the Mongol language, and since the man designated for the task was an Uighur, he used the Uighur alphabet for that purpose. Genghis did not learn to read but ordered his sons to learn the written language.

He also promulgated a code of laws and regulations in 1206, called yasa or yasaq, that provided severe punishment, for example, the death penalty applied to murder, major theft, adultery, malicious witchcraft, and other offenses. The severity of the laws resulted in an obedient society, which visitors observed with awe.

Conquest of Xixia, Jin, and Khwarazm

Genghis Khan’s conquests began in 1209 and his first target was the Tangut kingdom to his southwest called Xixia (Hsi Hsia), leading his army personally. After withstanding a siege of their capital city the Xixia accepted peace terms: submission to Genghis Khan and a pledge to support him in future campaigns, and the king’s daughter given to Genghis as wife. After this demonstration of force two sedentary Turkic peoples, Uighurs and Qarluks, came to offer surrender. Both would go far under Mongol rule.

Genghis Khan’s next victim was the Jurchen Jin (Chin) dynasty in north China. He set out against it in 1211 with three of his sons and 50,000 cavalrymen. Although no longer the ferocious fighters of a century ago, the Jin still had a 150,000 strong cavalry of Jurchen soldiers and an infantry of 300,000 to 400,000 Chinese men.

Moreover the Jin Empire had over 40 million people, three million of whom were Jurchen, opposed to the Mongol nation of not much over a million people. In 1211–14 the Mongols devastated much of northern China and looted three of Jin’s five capitals, until Jin submitted to a humiliating peace. Among the captives taken during this campaign was Yelu Chucai (Yeh-lu Ch’u-ts’ai), a learned man of Khitan background who had served in the Jin government.

He would later play an important role in the government of Genghis and his son Ogotai that benefited their Chinese subjects. North China suffered enormously between 1214 and the selesai fall of Jin in 1234, the result of Mongol raids, uprisings against Jin, and war between Jin and Southern Song (Sung).

Meanwhile commanders under Genghis conquered the state called Khara Khitai, situated to the west of Mongolia, in 1218. This cleared the way for Genghis to march against Khwarazm (or Khwarizm), a Muslim state that included Afghanistan and northern Iran, in 1219.

It involved taking heavily fortified cities such as Harat and Samarkand, for which Mongols used the bloody tactic of using captured prisoners as human shields and moat fillers for their assaulting forces. By 1223 Khwarazm had been subdued and Mongol governors had been installed and garrisons put in place.

While his generals proceeded westward across the Caucasus and into western Eurasia, defeating the Russian princes, Genghis returned to Mongolia in 1225. There he planned the destruction of Xixia, which had earlier promised to supply Genghis with men and supplies in his future campaigns but had refused when he began his war against Khwarazm.

Never forgiving anyone who had betrayed him, Genghis personally led the campaign against Xixia in 1226, destroying cities and the countryside and wrecking the irrigation works that rendered the land cultivable, and besieging its capital. Genghis Khan died in August 1227 because of complications from a fall while hunting in 1225.

According to his wishes the war against Xixia continued until its destruction. His last orders were “The Tangut people are a powerful, good and courageous people, but they are fickle. Slaughter them and take what you need to give to the army.... Take what you want until you can take no more.” Genghis Khan’s body was returned to Mongolia; en route anyone who saw his cortege was killed.

He was buried on Burkhan Khaldun; the exact burial place was kept secret and has not yet been found. Before his death he had divided his conquests among his four sons, who were his principal heirs, and other relatives, and appointed his third son, Ogotai, his successor as Grand Khan, subject to confirmation by the Khurialtai.

The Brutal Military Leader

Genghis Khan was unequaled as a military leader and conquered the largest empire yet seen and with unprecedented cruelty. He was a shrewd strategist who used many means to achieve his goals. He was a good psychologist who used terror and precedence to induce his enemies to surrender because any city that resisted would be razed and its people killed. He was a good organizer who militarized his whole people and saw to the logistical side of campaigns.

He was adept at using spies and probing actions to take the measures of his enemies. He also used diplomacy to prevent his enemies from uniting or forming alliances. Finally he learned new military technologies and adapted to new needs, for example employing Middle Eastern siege engineers to help him take walled cities.

To Christian Europeans he was the anti-Christ and Scourge of God. China had never experienced such brutal conquerors, who threatened to turn the agricultural country into pastureland for their horses. He was especially cruel to cities and city dwellers.

In his sweep across north China in 1212–1213 over 90 cities were left in ruins. The Jin capital in modern Beijing burned for three months. Those persons his forces let live because they had skills became Mongol slaves or were allowed to return to their ruined homes to serve their new lords.

Health Scares

Health Scares

Disease, medical practice, as well as public wellness take away hold long been subjects of conspiratorial allegations. Historians of before centuries typically link such suspicions to the vulnerability of a social social club threatened past times instability or war, as well as to the mysteriousness of illness prior to the historic menstruum of “scientific medicine.”

At the plow of the twenty-first century, fundamental discoveries as well as treatments take away hold transformed medicine, as well as the public is bombarded alongside a constant flow of health-related information carried past times the media. But despite these advances inward cognition as well as access to information, health-related conspiracy theories proliferated inward the instant one-half of the twentieth century.

It may go that, inward a civilization saturated alongside medical information, the body’s uncertainties as well as vulnerabilities are pervasive as well as prominent. Medical conspiracy theories also reverberate rising suspicion toward as well as resentment of the medical establishment, which, since the mid-nineteenth century, is increasingly prestigious, powerful, as well as rich.


Historical Precedents

Contagion was recognized long before microbes were identified. Notable conspiracy theories of the seventeenth to nineteenth centuries blamed illness on infection past times unusual enemies or domestic aliens. During the Salem witchcraft scare that culminated inward the trials of 1692–1693, routine forms of illness as well as decease were said to go the piece of work of witches, exactly far to a greater extent than fearsome than familiar diseases were the special “afflictions” caused past times demonic possession— screaming fits, visions, pains—which were considered highly contagious.

Historians stress that the witch-hunt was preceded past times a serial of disrupting calamities, including drought, floods, smallpox, as well as Indian wars, as well as that it took house during a hiatus inward governmental as well as legal authority.

The Philadelphia yellowish fever epidemic of 1793 occurred during the vulnerable early on republican period, which was characterized past times fearfulness of a French invasion. Faced alongside the epidemic, Philadelphia doctors speculated that the recent overflowing of Caribbean Area immigrants into the metropolis had brought a French contagion alongside them, mayhap equally portion of a deliberate French plot.

Influenza A virus subtype H5N1 unusual enemy also figured inward a prominent conspiracy theory almost the Great Flu pandemic that coincided alongside World War I. Spurred past times media stories revealing a High German conspiracy to spread contagion through Bayer aspirin tablets, public wellness authorities formally investigated the imported medicine.

The Growth of the Medical-Industrial-Governmental Complex

Influenza A virus subtype H5N1 decisive pace inward the formation of the modern medical establishment was the founding of the American Medical Association (AMA) inward 1847, which capped decades of scrap to transform a diverse, unregulated array of practices as well as practitioners into an exclusive, credentialed profession. Resistance to professionalizatin, which was widespread inward the nineteenth century, was collectively known equally the Popular Health Movement (PHM).

Like its post-1970 descendant, the Alternative Health Movement, the PHM comprised a various array of supporters who shared distrust or outright paranoia toward legitimate medical authority. Today, the split betwixt the profession as well as the public is to a greater extent than pronounced than ever: the AMA is reputedly the strongest as well as richest foyer inward Washington, piece the Alternative Health Movement has grown into an establishment inward its ain right.

The growth of “scientific medicine” inward the early on twentieth century decisively divided the layperson from the expert. Scientific medicine based medical practise on laboratory enquiry as well as credentialed expertise acquired through long, costly years of preparation at a shrinking number of medical schools that were selectively endowed past times the Rockefeller as well as Carnegie Trusts.

In the mid-twentieth century, the growth of related chemical, pharmaceutical, technological, as well as service industries brought an everincreasing involvement of private interests as well as funding into academic, research, as well as clinical medicine.

Beginning alongside the Pure Food Act of 1906, the U.S. regime has formally intertwined itself alongside healthcare as well as wellness policy. Since 1970, Washington has spun out a vast spider web of healthrelated agencies as well as centers, including the U.S. Department of Agriculture, the Environmental Protection Agency, as well as the agencies that operate inside the U.S. Department of Health as well as Human Services, which include the Food as well as Drug Administration (FDA) as well as the National Institutes of Health. Through these organizations, the regime has go involved inward all aspects of healthrelated delivery, licensing, regulation, funding, policy, research, education, as well as publicity.

The healthcare sector absorbs a vast amount of the national economy, having accounted for fourteen percent of the gross domestic production inward 2001. Although to a greater extent than money goes into healthcare, the systems that deliver it are breaking down. Doctors blame unregulated, price-fixing insurance companies; insurance companies blame price-fixing past times consolidating hospitals as well as the steep rises inward drug as well as technology scientific discipline costs. The healthcare consumer, meanwhile, faces enormous cost spikes as well as decreasing access to lineament care.

At the plow of the twenty-first century, government, business, as well as universities portion funding, enquiry projects, clinical facilities, as well as oversight personnel; manufacture as well as giant philanthropic trusts back upwardly teaching as well as research; as well as public relations firms piece of work alongside industry-supported scientific experts to feed information to the media.

Although medicine has ever been political inward the broad sense—a rootage as well as occupation of power—by the terminate of the twentieth century medicine was a major facet of the mightiness structure. Faced alongside this conglomerate of intersecting interests, many healthcare consumers vocalization the perception that private as well as collective bodily wellbeing calls for a mightiness scrap against fraud, exploitation, manipulation, as well as coercion.

Big Medicine as well as Overarching Conspiracy Theories

Some conspiracy theories posit seamless collusion amid the intersecting interests involved inward medicine. The Rockefeller conspiracy theory, which was promulgated inward the mid-twentieth century (Bealle), alleges that inward the 1930s Rockefeller crude as well as fiscal interests merged alongside the infamous Nazitainted High German chemic society I.

G. Farben to shape an international drug trust, which went on to command many banks as well as industries as well as to direct education, policy, as well as enquiry through gifts to agencies as well as universities. This theory, because of its emphasis on Rothschild funding as well as media monopoly, is unremarkably considered antisemitic.

Influenza A virus subtype H5N1 after elaboration asserts that Rockefeller interests financed the “green revolution” to develop super-profitable “superwheat” hybrids that bespeak large amounts of fertilizer, herbicides, as well as pesticides (commodities controlled past times Rockefeller), enabling Rockefeller drug as well as medical interests to turn a profit from resulting increases inward environmental as well as diet-related illness (Ruesch).

The “hidden cure” genre of overarching conspiracy theories alleges that the public is denied effective cures as well as treatments that the medical-pharmaceutical complex does non reckon sufficiently profitable. Influenza A virus subtype H5N1 prominent instance is the belief that, although the cure for cancer has been discovered, doctors, researchers, drug companies, the media, as well as the FDA take away hold conspired to suppress the cure inward social club to go along generating profits from cancer patients.

There is no plausible bear witness for the Rockefeller as well as hidden cure theories, which imagine an improbable flat of collusion across a vast array of institutions as well as professions. But it is non surprising that such theories are popular, given the really existent as well as profitable collusion of government, industry, as well as enquiry institutions at the expense of consumers.

For example, inward a pharmaceuticals marketplace controlled past times the FDA, the U.S. pharmaceutical manufacture enjoys monopoly-like power; as well as inward 2001, U.S. prescription drug costs—already much higher than inward other countries—spiked sixteen percent inward a unmarried year.

Fact-Based Theories

Many conspiracy theories grow past times citing a legitimate disclosure, linking it to a troubling public wellness situation, as well as explaining it all equally a large conspiracy—sometimes really plausibly. Patient security studies released inward the 1990s cited information indicating that 1 inward 500 infirmary patients is gravely injured or killed past times mistake.

Since a professional person code of secrecy is traditional inward medicine, the security researchers conducted their ain direct studies, finding that the vast bulk of iatrogenic (doctor-caused) disabilities as well as deaths are never reported, fifty-fifty inside hugger-mugger internal infirmary reviews. They concluded that the truthful per centum of infirmary patients killed past times a “medical mistake” is 1 inward 50 (Institute of Medicine).

Disclosures of harm caused past times prescription drugs oftentimes give ascent to theories almost prior cognition as well as cover-ups, or fifty-fifty almost deliberate plots to receive illness inward social club to turn a profit past times its treatment. There are parallels inward the expanse of surgery: for example, responses to well-publicized questions almost take in bypass surgery’s efficacy as well as dangers take away hold included allegations of unnecessary operation equally good equally an overarching theory that the production as well as handling of take in illness is a large manufacture inward which agribusiness as well as fast-food chains profitably receive the obesity as well as take in blockage from which medical as well as drug interests, cardiac surgeons, hospitals, as well as device makers profit.

Some conspiracy theories answer to bang trends inward novel diagnoses; examples include behavioral disorders such equally attending deficit disorder, mood disorders such equally depression as well as anxiety states, as well as so-called hormone deficiencies.

Profit is to a greater extent than oftentimes than non the ascribed motive for the conspiracy to diagnose as well as medicate, exactly some theorists posit to a greater extent than sinister aims, describing plots to debilitate the population alongside mind-numbing drugs such equally Prozac as well as Ritalin; to pacify women through “addicting” hormone replacement; to bring down the population past times impairing fertility; and, inward a menstruum of economical instability, to maintain the lower classes inward their house past times making them obese alongside fast food.

Fraud as well as Addiction

Tobacco is a compelling context as well as epitome for the perception of disease-related conspiracies involving profit, public relations, regime collusion, as well as scientific fraud. Broadly publicized exposés take away hold shown non alone that manufacture as well as regime leaders knew tobacco was both addictive as well as deadly, exactly that tobacco companies, guided past times their public relations consultants, influenced enquiry as well as fifty-fifty straight paid scientists to sign their names to favorable reports inward prestigious medical journals (Rampton as well as Stauber).

Influenza A virus subtype H5N1 number of conspiracy theories accuse manufacture as well as marketing interests, inward collusion alongside government, of addicting the population to, inward add-on to tobacco: street drugs, alcohol, hormones, Ritalin, Prozac, obese food, starchy food, television, the Internet, tearing films, sugar, shopping, pornography, as well as gambling.

Some theories draw pregnant collusion, for example, that the meat, dairy, as well as grain industries piece of work mitt inward mitt alongside chains similar McDonald’s, whose “supersize” meals assist increment rates of diabetes as well as thence that Eli Lilly tin reap greater profits from insulin.

The “food disparagement” laws passed past times many states inward the 1990s, which endeavour to suppress speculative criticism of nutrient safety, take away hold helped fuel the perception that agribusiness intimidates the media as well as buys off politicians.

Transgressive Science

New laboratory techniques as well as inventions take away hold given ascent to a number of conspiracy-tinged scenarios, including the accuse that the human genome projection is beingness used to develop pathogens that target racially specific populations. There is fearful speculation almost novel pathogens created inward the laboratory, including creature pathogens that cross over to humans as well as superpathogens produced through gene-splicing.

Outbreaks of Hanta virus, Legionnaire’s disease, as well as some of the rarer hepatitis strains take away hold been followed past times speculations that unsafe novel agents bred inward the laboratory take away hold been accidentally or deliberately released.

These fears grow from an anxiety almost the breaching of boundaries betwixt species, betwixt nature as well as science, as well as betwixt genetically distinct individuals. Some large-scale illness conspiracy theories oftentimes harmonize this boundary anxiety alongside an anxiety over geographic as well as demographic boundaries.

In an historic menstruum of globalization, boundaries no longer separate populations as well as nations, nor do they sequester diseases. Popular press books published inward the 1990s draw impending epidemics facilitated past times laboratory experimentation, jet-setting doctors, negligently unchecked urban overcrowding, volume migration, as well as international go (Garrett).

Immunization

One of the richest pop veins of conspiratorial theorizing focuses, non surprisingly, on vaccination programs. Although parents are gratuitous to reject to immunize their children, state, federal, as well as schoolhouse authorities exert considerable pressure.

Immunization programs developed past times the regime inward league alongside vaccine manufacturers (who turn a profit greatly), as well as aiming to include every child, stand upwardly for inward an immediate shape the combined powers of government, education, as well as commerce expressed through medical intervention.

The fact that serious adverse outcomes as well as fifty-fifty decease occur from a little per centum of vaccinations is widely publicized as well as fuels complaints almost medicalized coercion as well as speculations almost to a greater extent than far-reaching damage.

Elaborate theories almost intent as well as harm related to vaccination are widely discussed, especially on the Internet. New vaccines are constantly beingness tested, as well as covert experimentation is sometimes alleged: for example, in that location is a theory that a wellness maintenance organisation (HMO) inward California secretly tested a novel measles vaccine on 700 minority children (the occupation of minorities equally guinea pigs resonates alongside the infamous Tuskeegee medical experiment of the 1930s).

Officially reported “adverse events” tend to go right away apparent, exactly questioners of immunization programs speculate almost long-term harm, including developmental problems, chronic fatigue syndrome, autoimmune as well as neurological problems, as well as behavioral as well as learning disorders.

Since vaccines are modified pathogens, some antiimmunization protesters occupation a rhetoric of purity, complaining that the “pure” bodies of children are invaded, polluted, as well as disordered past times this literalized shape of governmental intrusion.

The public revelation that at to the lowest degree i common, mandated vaccine serum contained a mercury-based preservative called thimerosol was followed past times charges of outright poisoning as well as cover-ups. Acting on the theory that autism is caused past times unsafe vaccines inward general, as well as thimerosol inward particular, organizations of parents of autistic children were successful inward getting the thimerosol-containing vaccine pulled as well as the number brought before a congressional hearing, where a representative called for criminal penalties for whatsoever regime means that had covered upwardly the thimerosol danger.

Immunization packs together several paranoiainducing aspects of medicine: coercion past times power, population-wide inclusion, the invasion of the torso as well as the theatre unit of measurement system, as well as novel tinkerings that forever alter the body’s functioning.

Immunization sometimes serves equally the warp into which other conspiracy theories are woven. For example, a theory almost biochip implants for tracking as well as controlling the public converges alongside smallpox vaccination phobia inward a theory that smallpox vaccinations volition go used to implant tiny ID microchips useful for detecting foes during periods of social unrest.

Another theory uses immunization to link chemtrails as well as West Nile virus. Chemtrails, or contrails, are the visible condensation streaks left past times aircraft exhaust; conspiracy theorists suspect they are toxic as well as stand upwardly for hugger-mugger mind-control or weapons testing programs.

Citing outbreaks of West Nile virus as well as Legionnaire’s disease, as well as noting that authorities responded to West Nile past times spraying New York alongside questionable pesticides, i theorist posits that the outbreaks resulted from pathogens as well as toxins released equally chemtrails inward a covert experiment inward volume immunization.

Environmental Dangers

Conspiracy theories constantly emerge inward response to ever-recurring alarms almost environmental contamination. The dangers discussed include exposure to nuclear, microwave, as well as electromagnetic radiation; poisoning past times toxins, pathogens, as well as pollutants inward the environment; as well as contaminants inward nutrient as well as water.

Influenza A virus subtype H5N1 number of well-publicized incidents since 1970 take away hold fueled suspicions of widespread industrial fraud as well as negligence. These include several nuclear flora neardisasters inward the 1970s as well as the Kerr-McGee plutonium flora mystery, which involved the 1974 decease inward a one-car crash of whistle-blower Karen Silkwood (the dependent area of a 1984 movie).

Discoveries of illness clusters inward sites contaminated past times manufacture gave rise, inward the 1990s, to the volume media volume as well as celluloid dramas Influenza A virus subtype H5N1 Civil Action as well as Erin Brockovich, inward which poisoned families alongside sick or dying children are pitted against corporate bullies propped upwardly past times governmental as well as legal authority. Many cancer fears revolve or as well as thence suspicions of covered-up exposure as well as suppressed cognition of toxicity.

Some environmental alarmists take away hold laid out to emulate Rachel Carson, whose 1962 exposé of pesticide dangers turned public awareness toward environmental pollution. One self-proclaimed follow-up is the 1996 volume Our Stolen Future, whose authors await beyond cancer to the reproductive as well as developmental damages threatening futurity generations caused, they write, past times hormonally active pollutants, specially organochlorines.

Influenza A virus subtype H5N1 crimson flag, according to the endocrine disrupter thesis, is the alleged drib inward human sperm levels—a broadly publicized finding that led to much speculation almost the futurity of humanity, exactly which follow-up studies take away hold repeatedly shown to go unsubstantiated. Governmental responses to the endocrine disrupter scare illustrate the ineffectual oversight that helps bring upwardly conspiracy-tinged suspicions.

Although Congress, spurred past times scientific testimony almost emasculated wildlife, has undertaken a vast Environmental Protection Agency computer program to essay 80,000 chemicals for estrogenic agency, the USA is i of the few developed nations inward which chlorine pollution past times the newspaper as well as chemic industries continues unchecked.

The 1990s saw the publication of plausible, detailed reports as well as books exposing chemic manufacture malfeasance pulled off alongside the collusion of the regime as well as media. Behind Closed Doors as well as Toxic Deception draw machinations to forestall the rule of unsafe pollutants including dioxin (a strong organochlorine as well as a known carcinogen). PBS aired “Trade Secrets,” exposing how chemic companies concealed the toxic by-products of vinyl chloride, specially dioxin pollution.

Food Scares

The corporate force for genetically modified nutrient arouses neat suspicion. Critics accuse that GM nutrient (“Frankenfood”) is profitable to manufacture non alone because it tin go patented, exactly because crop uniformity volition eventually drive upwardly pesticide demand.

The accuse that large nutrient interests take away hold wages of poverty to opened upwardly novel markets for GM nutrient is restated past times conspiracy theorists, who draw a deliberate macroeconomic creation of nutrient shortages inward impoverished nations inward social club to opened upwardly the door to GM food. The nutrient industry’s opposition to GM nutrient labeling as well as precautionary measures fuels such suspicions.